|
Posted by lubow on August 28, 2008, 11:20 am
>
> Well, he is a liar and a slanderer and a plagiarist and an
> idiot AND a loser.
>
But that describes you, Bill. Particularly the last item in your list. Just so
you know, I don't think you're an idiot. Just a very disturbed old man who gets
whacky when told you cannot purchase domestic vodka with food stamps. I think
you also get whacky when you discover your Depends get soiled.
Get help. There are new meds out there to help delusional lunatics.
====================================
>
>
>> Don't be small minded like some here, forget the party.
>> Just because Biden is not a member of your party doesn't
>> mean he's not a good and decent man, because as far
>> as I can see he is.
>
> Well, he is a liar and a slanderer and a plagiarist and an
> idiot AND a loser.
>
> Remember, this is the guy who has run for president
> about a billion times and lost every time, and about five
> times ago his typically short-lived campaign went down
> in flames when he got caught plagiarizing his speeches from
> a British politician.
>
> As it turned out this was not new behavior because he
> was failed a class when he was caught plagiarizing a law
> school paper. But he did manage to graduate late from
> law school with overall grades just above failing, 76th out
> of 85 in his class.
>
> In 1972 his wife at the time made a fatal mistake that
> cost her and her infant daughter their lives, and seriously
> injured his two sons. She failed to yield to oncoming
> traffic while turning at an uncontrolled intersection, and
> their car was crushed by an 18-wheeler. The accident
> was completely investigated including sobriety tests
> for the truck driver and it was determined that Biden's
> wife was at fault. Yet the liar Biden has repeatedly
> falsely claimed that his wife was killed by a "truck
> driver who drank his lunch instead of eating it",
> causing great anguish to the innocent truck driver
> and his family.
>
> When asked about all of this lifelong behavior, Biden
> always uses the same dismissive rhetoric: it's all nothing,
> it's just a smear campaign by his political enemies, etc.
>
> In other words: surprise, surprise, he's just another
> under-acheiving, lying, slandering, cheating politician,
> kind of like if "Lowbrow" was running for vice-president.
> As always, we are being offered a tough choice here;
> we have candidates of such low moral fiber I'd be
> uncomfortable letting them into my home, but we
> have to do a lot of careful math to choose the
> lesser of the creepiness, or really just pick a key
> issue that you can "trust" the candidate on and go
> that way holding your nose to ignore the stench of
> their personal integrity (like 1992)...
>
> ---
> William Ernest Reid
> Post count: 1164
>
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap