|
Posted by PeterL on January 19, 2007, 8:03 pm
Robert Ricks wrote:
> I posted this question over a year ago and was encouraged by many to
> purchase bonds because "bonds should be part of ones portfolio."
>
> Let me try again with some data.
>
> What logic is there in buying bonds over CD's?
You are not missing a thing. Bonds are more liquid than CD's.
>
> For example: I just checked Schwab and they list 5 year bonds of AAA to A
> quality from 5.15 - 5.79. Of course, when most of us buy one (I've never
> purchased one, however), there is the brokerage fee. (And probably the same
> if we were to sell early). So, the percent I take home with me is really
> less than what is shown after fees, if the bond is held to maturity. - and
> if it isn't called, or if the company doesn't hit a streak of bad luck and
> go belly up. In other words, there is some risk and no 100% guarantee the
> coupons will be paid or the company will not have problems affecting the
> return of principle.
>
> On the other hand, I can buy a 5 year CD without any fee paying 5.30%
> interest (actually higher than many bonds, with FDIC insurance and 100%
> certain I have nothing to worry about (other than the US falling apart, in
> which case bonds would likely be in worse shape).
>
> Am I missing something here? Why would I want to own bonds that do carry
> risk when I can get a sure thing with 100% safety? "Because every portfolio
> (or most-not trying to argue minor technicalities here) should contain
> bonds" doesn't seem logical. 2+2=3? What am I misunderstanding?
>
> Steve
|