Can you spot the BS from Rick Ratchford...aka ProfitmaxTrading.com SPAM

Commodity and Futures - Physical commodity and financial futures markets. 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Can you spot the BS from Rick Ratchford...aka ProfitmaxTrading.com SPAM truth-b-told 08-27-2006
Posted by truth-b-told on August 27, 2006, 4:19 pm
Hey Ricky RAT Ratchford,

Aren't you proud that you created this FAKE NAME of "'Equalizer," in
order to promote and defend your wares?

You are an EMBARRASSMENT to the Futures Industry.

Sincerely,
gerillio.

########
########

Re: Making money online is for winners only. Sorry guys.

Posted By: Equalizer
Date: Saturday, 1 July 2006, at 4:05 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Rat's Latests MLM Scam *PIC* (Leana)

The Ethos product is HOT HOT HOT!

There is this guy who is trying to smear it, but it has been around 10
years and everyone using it LOVES IT! Me included!

So dig up all the dirt you can. But Ethos is the REAL DEAL.

Ciao' baby!

;-)

Oh yeah. Members of Precision Trading Membership get the real deal
also. Like Leana says, they know in ADVANCE when to catch the moves in
the 20 markets covered.

Yada yada.

########

Re: Rick Ratchford false statements.

Posted By: Equalizer
Date: Sunday, 2 July 2006, at 3:44 p.m.

In Response To: Rick Ratchford false statements. (TT)

Why is Rick Ratchford attacked when there are so many fly-by-night scam
artists being ignored?

Because Rick Ratchford has something, something very valuable and
important and rare.

So you have the jealous losers, like UMT, Ron, TT, Blind Hog and all
the different aliases they use. Yes, they pretend to be hundreds of
others and want others to fall for that game. Only the idiots fall for
it, and the smart ones end up as a member of Rick's membership.

And that bugs some of the vendors also. They don't want their clients
streaming to Rick's service. So what do they do? They censor this
messages. They flame his posts pretending to be just a regular joe.

Yet, it has been 10 years and going and Rick's service continues to get
bigger and better. He's been accused of anything and everything that
would have anyone locked up and the key thrown away long ago, but yet
there he is. This is because his accusers are nothing but malicious
liers with no self-respect, no success, and a whole lot of jealously.

And they dig and dig and find that Rick leads a normal life, has a
family, nice home, enjoys life, and they try to twist it around as if
there is something wrong with all that. And if he invests in real
estate, it must be because he isn't a good trader. And if you operates
another business, perhaps one being an MLM type business, it must be
that he isn't successful as a trader.

They accuse him of SPIN, but it is these losers that are putting on the
SPIN. They spin every word in every direction. But why Rick alone? And
why for so many years?

Simply put...Rick is successful at what he does and it just bugs a few
who attract nothing but mediocrisy to their lives.

And many times over the years Rick has tried to help these poor souls.
But they resist! It is not in their nature to succeed and they want to
pull everyone else down to their level.

But in the midst of all this, Rick continues to attract individuals who
have a mind of their own and are not easily maneuvered by these few
clowns and their many masks. They can reason that there must be
something to what Rick is doing or he would not still be able to do
this for so many years. They know that he cannot have succeeded for 10
years going by pulling in "newbies" as these forum clowns would have
them believe. Only solid and serious traders that value his services
could keep such a service alive year after year.

Rick's public forecasting is public record. There is no hiding it. His
accuracy is off the charts (no pun intended). No one, and I mean NO
ONE, is posting such accurate forecasts on various markets in the
public domain year after year than Rick. No wonder he is being singled
out by some.

So let them spin all they want about Rick. Let them ban and censor his
posts on these forums out of fear that real traders will find out about
him and decide to use his services.

They've tried every trick in the book and nothing works. NOTHING WORKS!
You cannot hide a valuable gem forever. You might temporarily stiffle
its brilliance, but it will find a crack and shine through.

The most glaring fact before all reasonable traders is this: While the
few will expend an incredible amount of energy and time to try and
deceive the public by pretending to be many people criticizing Rick's
work, even making comments such as "over 90% of traders post negative
experiences with Rick...", the FACT is that in 10 years you may have
only read ONE actual customer that was not happy, and he was not happy
because of what he perceived as "ego", not the service itself. In
addition, had there even been more than one, nothing is all things to
everyone. YET the ONLY negative remarks you read are people who NEVER,
EVER have used Rick's service.

That says a lot of what is really going on around the internet.

And if someday Rick decided to no longer share his work with anyone
else and just keep it to himself, he will do just fine because his work
is simply one of the most accurate there is. Period.

########

Re: A Market 'Forecast' and a MLM Pitch Too!!

Posted By: Rick Ratchford (Analyst - ProfitMaxtrading.com)
Date: Thursday, 4 May 2006, at 7:37 p.m.

In Response To: A Market 'Forecast' and a MLM Pitch Too!! (UMT)

"What professionalism!!!"
"What a flake."

And living the American Dream.

You need to learn to be more positive about things UMT. Negativity
attracts things most people do not want. So you have been surrounding
yourself with nothing but one failure after another, and your
bitterness towards the success of others is clearly manifest.

Over 400 have joined my organization in the last 10 days in this one
business alone. You may ridicule this, but success is success and comes
to those who embrace opportunity rather than scorn it. I'm in the
business of creating winners out of people. It's a job that is
fulfilling and rewarding.

And this is just one of several businesses I'm successfully involved
in. You see UMT, the law of attraction will draw success to you if you
allow it. But it can also draw the worse life has to offer when you
invite it.

So with all sincerity, I hope you consider my words carefully and help
yourself starting now.

Thank you.

:)

PS: I have no reason to dislike you UMT. You dislike yourself enough
for everyone. Change your thoughts and words and be well.

Rick J Ratchford

"$10 to change your mind ...
$10 to change your life!"


Posted by truth-b-told on August 27, 2006, 4:29 pm
Excellent post gerillio,

Here's another one.

Sincerely,
gerillio.

#######

Here is another classic SPIN-TWISTY past post of yours!!

I have to tip my hat at John Lothian. He can really poke a lot of
holes, in your SPIN-TWISTY posts!!

I have to agree with Lothian's comments, concerning what you say about
your pay site members and Fdates. Your personal comments that you make
in your own hype-ego-post, certainly is somewhat "misleading,
deceptive, fraudulent."

Your opening paragraph, says it all. You claim that you have a method,
if the newcomer wants to pay for it.....then you also claim that other
members have their own methods, that they trade with...and this is why
yours is NOT a METHOD!! So if it is NOT a METHOD, what are you really
trying to teach the newcomer, and why do you charge a monthly fee, with

your pay site membership, if you also tell all of the members that they

should NOT take your trading advice or set-ups? Say what you want, but
you also make claims and force all newcomers to sign a piece of paper,
in which you state that you will provide "information only," on your
non-disclosure forms? So if any newcomer chooses to ignore your Trade
forecasts and Fdate and Ceppro set-ups, why do they have to sign into
your pay site, and pay you for a METHOD which seems to be "non-trading
advice?"....and what do you really teach them anyway? Do you teach them

NOT to trade your own set-ups, because it isn't an "ACTUAL TRADING
METHOD?"


Sincerely,
gerillio.


##############################
##############################


From: FutureSoft - view profile
Date: Tues, Sep 1 1998 12:00 am
Groups: misc.invest.futures
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse | Find messages by this author


That's right

Fdates are NOT a method. They are dates, information, data, input, etc.

etc.

We do have a method on how to use this information, if the trader so
chooses to do so. Many have their own methods and still use Fdates.
That's why
it is not a method. That is why we have a membership, to share these
things.
And your continual bashing is why you are behind the eight ball.

Oh, and one last thing since you brought up John's name, another Fdate
critic.

John Lothian once took it upon himself to contact several of our
members. I was notified by many of them of his inquiry and provided a
copy of
their replies. Seemed the majority of them were very SATISFIED with the

service and information, and are repeat customers. They are repeat
customers
because they are getting information that they feel is very valuable.

John of course has decided not to mention any of this here.


Do you know how to spell SATISFIED CUSTOMERS? That is why I'm in
business,
to provide an excellent service to the best of my abilities.


Good Trading to you all!


========================================================
The Membership for Futures Traders: http://FSoftPublishing.com


"The BEST information for determining market trend changes anywhere!"
========================================================
Rick Ratchford / Market Analyst Email:
Pro...@FSoftPublishing.com


There is risk of loss in trading. This post is not a recommendation to
buy or sell. This post is merely the opinion of the author.
========================================================


#####################################################
#####################################################


From: I4Lothian - view profile
Date: Wed, Sep 2 1998 12:00 am
Email: i4loth...@aol.com (I4Lothian)
Groups: misc.invest.futures
Not yet ratedRating:
show options


Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse | Find messages by this author




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

>That's right
>Fdates are NOT a method. They are dates, information, data, input, etc. etc.
>We do have a method on how to use this information, if the trader so chooses
>to do so. Many have their own methods and still use Fdates. That's why it is
>not a method. That is why we have a membership, to share these things. And
>your continual bashing is why you are behind the eight ball.
>Oh, and one last thing since you brought up John's name, another Fdate
>critic.
>John Lothian once took it upon himself to contact several of our members. I
>was notified by many of them of his inquiry and provided a copy of their
>replies. Seemed the majority of them were very SATISFIED with the service
>and information, and are repeat customers. They are repeat customers because
>they are getting information that they feel is very valuable.
>John of course has decided not to mention any of this here.
>Do you know how to spell SATISFIED CUSTOMERS? That is why I'm in business,
>to provide an excellent service to the best of my abilities.
>Good Trading to you all!


Rick-

As you know, you had posted several letters from "satisfied" customers
in response to a challenge about where were all the successful Fdate
traders. Since you are often accused of making these up (easy enough to
do), I
thought I would make a simple inquiry into their experiences with
Fdates and see
if they were real and if they were successful trading.

The results I found was that none were currently trading Fdates. While

they may have spoken highly of the report, none were currently trading
this
information. This hardly seemed to blunt the challenge put to you of
where were all the successful Fdate traders. These results also
reinforce
the concept that Fdates are untradeable (successfully that is). We are

still waiting for a Fdate trader to provide trading statements showing
success.

We had an e-mail discussion at the time, and I encouraged you to clean
up your act a bit. Attached is my response to you.

You call me an "Fdate critic." I would say that I am a critic of
misleading, deceptive and ambigous promotional material.
Unfortunately, your
Fdates promotions to-date have fallen into this category. You have
chosen
your niche in the marketplace. You have been warned of the peril of
your ways and
offered many friendly suggestions (see the "risk disclosure" in your
signature
line). You have been reported to the CFTC by one of your own Fdaters.
You
have been reported to the CFTC by others, not me.

I find your Fdates promotions to be misleading, deceptive and
fraudulent. You have never, ever, answered the question of what are
the specific
criteria you are measuring when making your "highly accurate" statement
about
Fdates. That you have no specific criteria to measure makes your
"highly accurate"
statement fraudulent. You can try to hide behind your killfile, and
you can drop
"highly accurate" from your description of Fdates. But that does not
change the
past and your intent to fraudulently portray Fdates as something they
are
not.

If you make a claim, be prepared to back it up. If you can't, be
prepared for
the consequences.

Regards,
John J. Lothian


Disclosure: Futures trading involves financial risk, lots of it!


Posted by truth-b-told on August 27, 2006, 6:12 pm
1 From: truth-b-told - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 7:46 pm
Groups: misc.invest.futures
Not yet ratedRating:
show options

1......"I do NOT use fake email addresses to impersonate. No matter
what
a flamer suggests." Posted By: Rick Ratchford (Analyst -
ProfitMaxtrading.com)
Date: Friday, 10 February 2006, at 11:55 a.m.

Sincerely,
gerillio.

########

2.....From: truth-b-told - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 8:04 pm
Groups: misc.invest.futures
Not yet ratedRating:
show options

"Here is a great deal on a Toastmaster Breadmaker. It is new and
retails for a hundred bucks. On Ebay, its starting bid is 59 bucks!"

Date: Wed, Jan 29 2003 2:17 am

#######

3.....From: truth-b-told - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 10:16 pm
Groups: misc.invest.futures
Not yet ratedRating:
show options

Rick's reply, in regards to his "ILikeBoys post" that he made, using
Kowabunga as his handle name:

"That was a situation where BOTH Mr. 50% and I were in a battle
which we both realized was about the dumbest thing we ever did."

From: "Kowabunga"
author
Date: 1999/09/11

########

4......From: truth-b-told - view profile
Date: Mon, Feb 13 2006 1:32 pm
Groups: misc.invest.futures

Ratchford.....making comments to a Pete Stapleton, who is a Financial
Astrologer......concerning market predictions using Astrology:

"Now, just because I simply stated what I knew to be a fact
doesn't mean you should respond by suggesting that I would use anything
that comes from your astro-zodiac website or anything else associated
with this type of
(analysis?). Why damage your credibility further? To suggest all your
predictions came true was bad enough, to then outright lie that someone

is using your data when in fact the thought of doing so is repulsive is
even
worse.

Pete, it is obvious that you want to be recognized as god-perfect in
your predictions. But nobody is perfect, including myself. Don't make
it
worse now by making these off-the-wall comments about stealing and
dependancy
to your data, things that would require I be drenched in mind-altering
drugs and not fed for a week to even contemplate."

From: Rick Ratchford -
view profile
Date: Mon, Dec 31 2001 11:54 am

#######

5.... "As I've repeatedly have stated
here in the past, Fdates does not offer trade recommendations, nor does
it
offer exact entry/exit prices. That is why as I've said before it is
NOT an
advisory service and therefore does not apply under the same
guidelines."

Date: Thurs, Mar 12 1998 12:00 am

########

6....From: truth-b-told - view profile
Date: Wed, Feb 15 2006 4:27 pm
Groups: misc.invest.futures
Rating: (1 user)
show options

"That 'headache' has nothing to do with the reality of the
forecasts working out 90%+ of the time on these public forums."

############################


Hey Ratchford,

Now you are telling us that are up to +90% accurate in your forecasts?

HOGWASH Rick !!

Ridiculous statement Ratchford !! I am sure the CFTC and the NFA will
pay you a visit soon!! Your post below, is full of hope and dreams. How

many video markets did you make forecasts for, and was this S&P video,
the most accurate one out of the forecast video group, that you could
come up with? How long have you been making SPAM videos? Do you have a
CTA License? Is this Candid Camera?

Again Rick, the sole reason why you are doing this promotional video,
is because you WANT to impress and attract newcomers to your pay site.
This is why you have gone to enormous lengths, with your recent video,
to fluff it up little, and make outrageous claims of being +90%
accurate in your posts. If you are still making claims of being +90%
accurate, what happened to your recent AD forecast, and your Cattle
trades, and the S&P forecast from early January, and your Coffee trade,

along with a few other trades, where you are caught on the wrong side,
and your cycle turn dates, were WRONG, +90% of the time? This fantasy
post of yours, is really getting pretty deep, and especially when you
are now claiming to being +90% accurate. Desperate times calls for
desperate posts!!


Sincerely,
gerillio.

########


Ratchford, bragging about his recent S&P forecast video, and looking
for sympathy, love and new pay site members, in the Commodity Cafe:

Posted By: Rick Ratchford (Analyst - ProfitMaxtrading.com)
Date: Tuesday, 14 February 2006, at 1:58 p.m.

"There are a number of individuals here that are extremely prejudicial,

jealous, or a number of other ills that cause them to ridicule that
which works."

Although I've spent years providing before-the-fact forecasts in text
mode, skeptics close their eyes to the facts out of prejudice or
whatever reason and spout out their negative comments in order to sway
the minds of individuals not strong enough in experience to realize
what is happening to them.

I've noted some have taken their skepticism from not being able to
UNDERSTAND what I'm talking about. One individual stated he gets a
'headache' trying to understand me. That 'headache' has nothing to do
with the reality of the forecasts working out 90%+ of the time on these

public forums. It has to do with not speaking the same language that I
do. Yet, the reasonable person would not view this as a reason to
attack my work publicly as some do. What a shame.

Anyway, yesterday I treated everyone who had subscribed to my FREE
newsletter with a VIDEO walk-thru of a BUY trade in the SP500 for today

(2/14). This was done and shared BEFORE-THE-FACT and thus indisputable.

With the VIDEO, I made it much easier (from the feedback I've received
today) for many to understand what I was saying and thinking as I
walked through, step-by-step, the BUY trade for 2/14.

Now I could go on and on telling you what the video said, but why? Go
watch it for yourself or forget it and keep thinking negatively about
market forecasting.

Bottom line: PROOF has been provided once again why we call our
membership the PRECISION Trading Membership. No matter how much you can

convince yourself otherwise, that demonstration PROVED without a
reasonable doubt that today's SP500 was forecasted with precision.


-R


Posted by ProfitMaxTrading.com on August 27, 2006, 7:28 pm
Your favorite product has once again made the headlines.

http://www.getcommissionchecks.com

I'm loving every minute of it.




> Hey Ricky RAT Ratchford,



Posted by ProfitMaxTrading.com on August 27, 2006, 8:09 pm
You thrive on ignorance, don't you Geribilo?

The FTC is warning you to beware of actual scams and you assume that every
product that ever comes out has got a problem. What a world you live in.
Bottled up in your single-wide broken-down trailor, living off of our tax
money via welfare checks and food stamps, writing all kinds of conspiracy
theories in order to add meaning to your life.

You know what? There isn't any meaning to your life from what I can see in
your ridiculous postings.

So you think that there will never be a way to increase gas mileage. Is that
it? Wow, what a negative person with no foresight. Fact is, there are ways
to increase your gas mileage 5 times and more. Unfortunately such technology
is being held back by special interest in big oil and other entities.

While there are indeed gas pills and other junk out there, products that do
work exist. And I've PERSONALLY seen with my own eyes a product that saves
me a lot of money at the pump. All your pomp and lather about scams and
so-forth doesn't mean squat with what is in reality a great product. And
quoting a bunch of yahoos posting negative things about something they've
never tried or have an agenda about is nothing more than what you do here on
this newsgroup flaming vendors.

I pity the life you've chosen for yourself. However, I'm not pained by it.
My feeling is that you deserve all the misery you've been bringing upon
yourself. You can try to deceive people with your flaming campaign with the
help of your equally mental buddy UMT/nospam/blopper, but people are not as
stupid as you guys assume. I know this for a fact, because several have
contacted me and said as much.

While the EPA has tested more than a 100 products alleging gas-saving, this
does not include ALL the products available, including the one that I know
works for me, my friends and family. I can't even keep an inventory as this
stuff sells so fast. And it is to people asking me who've bought before or
heard from someone who bought from me.

That's just the way it is. Pure fact.

And until there is some official word otherwise to suggest the product that
is working for me is not good to use, I'm going to go by what I can see by
personal use and not what a bunch of yahoo conspiracy theorists like you say
about it.





>
> Hey Retard Rick,
>
> Read this:
>
> http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/gasave.htm
>
> For those who would like to make a complaint on Rick Ratchford and his
> Ethos PEDDLING, please call the FREE telephone number listed at the
> bottom of this article.
>
> Oh, what the heck, I'll post the link here: The FTC works for the
> consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices
> in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot,
> stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint or to get free information on
> consumer issues, visit www.ftc.gov or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP
> (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters Internet,
> telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into
> Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of
> civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> gerillio.
>
> ##########
> ##########
>
>
> Facts for Consumers PDF Version
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Gas-Saving" Products: Fact or Fuelishness?
>
> Gas prices are up, and so is the volume of advertising for "gas-saving"
> products. When gasoline prices rise, consumers often look for ways to
> improve fuel efficiency. Although there are practical steps you can
> take to increase gas mileage, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) warns
> you to be wary of any gas-saving claims for automotive devices or oil
> and gas additives. Even for the few gas-saving products that have been
> found to work, the savings have been small.
>
> "Gas-Saving" Advertising Claims
> Be skeptical of the following kinds of advertising claims.
>
> "This gas-saving product improves fuel economy by 20 percent."
> Claims usually tout savings ranging from 12 to 25 percent. However, the
> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evaluated or tested more than
> 100 alleged gas-saving devices and has not found any product that
> significantly improves gas mileage. In fact, some "gas-saving" products
> may damage a car's engine or cause substantial increases in exhaust
> emissions.
> The gas-saving products on the market fall into clearly defined
> categories. Although the EPA has not tested or evaluated every product,
> it has tried to examine at least one product in each category. See
> "Devices Tested by EPA" at the end of this brochure for category
> descriptions and product names.
>
> "After installing your product on my car, I got an extra 4 miles [6.4
> kilometers] per gallon [3.8 liters]."
> Many ads feature glowing testimonials by satisfied customers. Yet, few
> consumers have the ability or the equipment to test for precise changes
> in gas mileage after installing a gas-saving product. Many variables
> affect fuel consumption, including traffic, road and weather
> conditions, and the car's condition.
> For example, one consumer sent a letter to a company praising its
> "gas-saving" product. At the time the product was installed, however,
> the consumer also had received a complete engine tune-up - a fact not
> mentioned in the letter. The entire increase in gas mileage attributed
> to the "gas-saving" product may well have been the result of the
> tune-up alone. But from the ad, other consumers could not have known
> that.
>
> "This gas-saving device is approved by the Federal government."
> No government agency endorses gas-saving products for cars. The most
> that can be claimed in advertising is that the EPA has reached certain
> conclusions about possible gas savings by testing the product or by
> evaluating the manufacturer's own test data. If the seller claims that
> its product has been evaluated by the EPA, ask for a copy of the EPA
> report, or check www.epa.gov for information. In some instances, false
> claims of EPA testing or approval have been made.
> Product Complaints and Refunds
> If you're dissatisfied with a gas-saving product, contact the
> manufacturer and ask for a refund. Most companies offer money-back
> guarantees. Contact the company, even if the guarantee period has
> expired.
>
> If you're not satisfied with the company's response, contact your local
> or state consumer protection agency or the Better Business Bureau.
>
> Shifting Gears: Real Money-Saving Steps
> There are numerous no- or low-cost steps you can take to combat rising
> gas prices. The most important place to start is at the gas pump; buy
> only the octane level gas you need. All gas pumps must post the octane
> rating of the gas under the FTC's Fuel Rating Rule. Remember, the
> higher the octane, the higher the price. Check your owner's manual to
> determine the right octane level for your car.
>
> Here are some additional tips from the EPA to help you get better gas
> mileage.
>
> Drive more efficiently
>
> Stay within posted speed limits. The faster you drive, the more fuel
> you use. For example, driving at 65 miles per hour (mph), rather than
> 55 mph, increases fuel consumption by 20 percent. Driving at 75 mph,
> rather than 65 mph, increases fuel consumption by another 25 percent.
> Use overdrive gears. Overdrive gears improve the fuel economy of your
> car during highway driving. Your car's engine speed decreases when you
> use overdrive. This reduces both fuel consumption and engine wear.
> Use cruise control. Using cruise control on highway trips can help you
> maintain a constant speed and, in most cases, reduce your fuel
> consumption.
> Anticipate driving situations. If you anticipate traffic conditions and
> don't tailgate, you can avoid unnecessary braking and acceleration, and
> improve your fuel economy by 5 to 10 percent. In city driving, nearly
> 50 percent of the energy needed to power your car goes to acceleration.
> Go easy on the gas pedal and brakes. "Jack-rabbit" starts and sudden
> stops are wasteful.
> Avoid unnecessary idling. Turn off the engine if you anticipate a
> lengthy wait. No matter how efficient your car is, unnecessary idling
> wastes fuel, costs you money and pollutes the air.
> Combine errands. Several short trips taken from a cold start can use
> twice as much fuel as one trip covering the same distance when the
> engine is warm.
> Remove excess weight from the trunk. Avoid carrying unneeded items,
> especially heavy ones. An extra 100 pounds in the trunk reduces a
> typical car's fuel economy by one to two percent.
> Maintain your car
>
> Keep your engine tuned. Studies have shown that a poorly tuned engine
> can increase fuel consumption by as much as 10 to 20 percent depending
> on a car's condition. Follow the recommended maintenance schedule in
> your owner's manual; you'll save fuel and your car will run better and
> last longer.
> Keep your tires properly inflated and aligned. Car manufacturers must
> place a label in the car stating the correct tire pressure. The label
> usually is on the edge of the door or door jamb, in the glove box, or
> on the inside of the gas cap cover. If the label lists a psi (pounds
> per square inch) range, use the higher number to maximize your fuel
> efficiency. Underinflated tires cause fuel consumption to increase by
> six percent.
> Change your oil. Clean oil reduces wear caused by friction between
> moving parts and removes harmful substances from the engine. Change
> your oil as recommended by the vehicle manufacturer.
> Check and replace air filters regularly. Your car's air filter keeps
> impurities in the air from damaging internal engine components. Not
> only will replacing a dirty air filter improve your fuel economy, it
> also will protect your engine. Clogged filters can cause up to a 10
> percent increase in fuel consumption.
> Consider buying a fuel efficient vehicle
> Deciding which vehicle to buy may be the most important fuel economy
> decision you make. The difference between a car that gets 20 MPG (miles
> per gallon) and one that gets 30 MPG amounts to $1,500 over 5 years,
> assuming gas costs $1.50 per gallon and you drive 15,000 miles a year.
>
> Visit www.fueleconomy.gov for more information. You'll find gas mileage
> estimates and other data from EPA for 1985-2003 model year cars.
>
> EPA Evaluation Efforts
> The EPA evaluates or tests products to determine whether their use will
> result in any significant improvement or detriment to fuel economy.
> However, the EPA cannot say what effect gas-saving products will have
> on a vehicle over time because it hasn't conducted any durability
> tests. It's possible that some products may harm the car or may
> otherwise adversely affect its performance. In fact, today's vehicles'
> emission control systems are very sophisticated and complex. They have
> On Board Diagnostic features that alert the driver to problems
> associated with the emission control and fuel delivery systems.
> Retrofit products may have an adverse effect on these systems.
>
> Devices Tested by EPA
> The following list categorizes various types of "gas-saving" products,
> explains how they're used and gives product names. Those with asterisks
> may save measurable, but small, amounts of gas. All others have been
> found not to increase fuel economy.
>
> Air Bleed Devices. These devices bleed air into the carburetor. They
> usually are installed in the Positive Crankcase Ventilation line or as
> a replacement for idle-mixture screws.
>
> The EPA has evaluated the following products: ADAKS Vacuum Breaker Air
> Bleed; Air-Jet Air Bleed; Aquablast Wyman Valve Air Bleed; Auto-Miser;
> Ball-Matic Air Bleed; Berg Air Bleed; Brisko PCV; Cyclone-Z; Econo
> Needle Air Bleed; Econo-Jet Air Bleed Idle Screws; Fuel Max*; Gas
> Saving Device; Grancor Air Computer; Hot Tip; Landrum Mini-Carb;
> Landrum Retrofit Air Bleed; Mini Turbocharger Air Bleed; Monocar HC
> Control Air Bleed; Peterman Air Bleed; Pollution Master Air Bleed;
> Ram-Jet; Turbo-Dyne G.R. Valve.
>
> Vapor Bleed Devices. These devices are similar to the air bleed
> devices, except that induced air is bubbled through a container of a
> water and anti-freeze mixture, usually located in the engine
> compartment.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Atomized Vapor Injector; Frantz Vapor Injection
> System; Hydro-Vac: POWERFUeL; Mark II Vapor Injection System; Platinum
> Gasaver; V-70 Vapor Injector; SCATPAC Vacuum Vapor Induction System:
> Econo-Mist Vacuum Vapor Injection System; Turbo Vapor Injection System.
>
> Liquid Injection. These products add liquid into the fuel/air intake
> system and not directly into the combustion chamber.
> The EPA has evaluated: Goodman Engine System-Model 1800; Waag-Injection
> System*.
>
> Ignition Devices. These devices are attached to the ignition system or
> are used to replace original equipment or parts.
> The EPA has evaluated: Autosaver; Baur Condenser; BIAP Electronic
> Ignition Unit; Fuel Economizer; Magna Flash Ignition Control System;
> Paser Magnum/Paser 500/Paser 500 HEI; Special Formula Ignition Advance
> Springs.
>
> Fuel Line Devices (heaters or coolers). These devices heat the fuel
> before it enters the carburetor. Usually, the fuel is heated by the
> engine coolant or by the exhaust or electrical system.
> The EPA has evaluated: FuelXpander; Gas Meiser I; Greer Fuel Preheater;
> Jacona Fuel System; Optimizer; Russell Fuelmiser.
>
> Fuel Line Devices (magnets). These magnetic devices, clamped to the
> outside of the fuel line or installed in the fuel line, claim to change
> the molecular structure of gasoline.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: PETRO-MIZER; POLARION-X; Super-Mag Fuel
> Extender; Wickliff Polarizer [fuel line magnet/intake air magnet].
>
> Fuel Line Devices (metallic). Typically, these devices contain several
> dissimilar metals that are installed in the fuel line, supposedly
> causing ionization of the fuel.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Malpassi Filter King [fuel pressure regulator];
> Moleculetor.
>
> Mixture Enhancers (under the carburetor). These devices are mounted
> between the carburetor and intake manifold and supposedly enhance the
> mixing or vaporization of the air/fuel mixture.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Energy Gas Saver; Environmental Fuel Saver; Gas
> Saving and Emission Control Improvement Device; Glynn-50;
> Hydro-Catalyst Pre-Combustion Catalyst System; PETROMIZER SYSTEM;
> Sav-A-Mile; Spritzer; Turbo-Carb; Turbocarb.
>
> Mixture Enhancers (others). These devices make some general
> modifications to the vehicle intake system.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Basko Enginecoat; Dresser Economizer;
> Electro-Dyne Superchoke; Filtron Urethane Foam Filter; Lamkin Fuel
> Metering Device; Smith Power and Deceleration Governor.
>
> Internal Engine Modifications. These devices make physical or
> mechanical function changes to the engine.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: ACDS Automotive Cylinder Deactivation System*;
> Dresser Economizer; MSU Cylinder Deactivation*.
>
> Accessory Drive Modifiers. These devices reduce power to specific auto
> accessories.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Morse Constant Speed Accessory Drive **;
> P.A.S.S. Kit**; PASS Master Vehicle Air Conditioner**.
>
> Fuels and Fuel Additives. These materials are added to the gas tank.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Bycosin; EI-5 Fuel Additive; Fuelon Power;
> Johnson Fuel Additive; NRG #1 Fuel Additive; QEI 400 Fuel Additive;
> Rolfite Upgrade Fuel Additive; Sta-Power Fuel Additive; Stargas Fuel
> Additive; SYNeRGy-1; Technol G Fuel Additive; ULX-15/ULX-15D; Vareb 10
> Fuel Additive; XRG #1 Fuel Additive.
>
> Oils and Oil Additives. Usually these materials are poured into the
> crankcase.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: Analube Synthetic Lubricant; Tephguard.
>
> Driving Habit Modifiers. These are lights or sound devices to tell the
> driver to reduce acceleration or to shift gears.
>
> The EPA has evaluated: AUTOTHERM**; Fuel Conservation Device; Gastell;
> IDALERT**.
>
> Miscellaneous. The EPA has evaluated: BRAKE-EZ; Dynamix; Fuel
> Maximiser; Gyroscopic Wheel Cover; Kamei Spoilers**; Kat's Engine
> Heater; Lee Exhaust and Fuel Gasification EGR; Mesco Moisture
> Extraction System; P.S.C.U. 01 Device; Treis Emulsifier.
>
> * Indicated a very small improvement in fuel economy but with an
> increase in exhaust emissions. According to Federal regulations,
> installation of this device could be considered illegal tampering.
>
> ** Indicated a very small improvement in fuel economy without an
> increase in exhaust emissions. However, cost-effectiveness must be
> determined by the consumer for a particular application.
>
> For More Information
> For information about EPA test procedures and test results, visit
> www.epa.gov/otaq/consumer.htm or write: Verification and Compliance
> Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Environmental
> Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; or call:
> 734-214-4925.
>
> The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and
> unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information
> to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint or to
> get free information on consumer issues, visit www.ftc.gov or call
> toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The
> FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other
> fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online
> database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement
> agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
Rick "Profitmaxtrading" Ratchford.....is a JOKE!!! July 31, 2006, 7:14 pm
Famous Rick "ProfitmaxTrading " Ratchford quotes.... September 22, 2006, 11:28 am
ProfitmaxTrading.com, aka ILikeBoys Rick Ratchford, can't comment on... August 8, 2006, 11:33 am
Another classic Rick Ratchford, aka ProfitmaxTrading thread....... August 25, 2006, 8:19 pm
Classic Rick Ratchford.....SPAM!!!! April 22, 2007, 12:20 pm
Rick Ratchford, aka ProfitmaxTrading.com spammer....& FAKE IP NUMBERS!!!! August 13, 2006, 5:53 pm
ProfitmaxTrading.com and other pathetic SPAM links!! August 28, 2006, 9:36 pm
Rick Ratchford SPAM....Buyer Beware!!! September 16, 2006, 10:46 pm
Rick "ProfitmaxTrading" Ratchford's latest MLM SCAM...... August 7, 2006, 9:27 am
Ho, Ho, Ho,....How to spot a Liar!!!! December 14, 2006, 7:30 am

other essential online resources:
United States Treasury
US Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Stock Exchange
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Accounting and Tax Software Forums

Contact Us | Privacy Policy   XML SitemapXML Sitemap