|
Posted by Dale Legan on May 27, 2006, 1:08 am
Those who haven't made mistakes haven't done anything. Albert
Einstien...
Recently, mr X , trying to detract from the fact that he/she is
unable to dispute anything concerning the excellent technical work
posted to this site. And make others forget the challenge to actually
produce something himself. So terrified was he/she that he/she went
back and posted a series of what he calls rants of mine.
Let's look at that. Reading through them it is clear to see I said
several times I just got home from dialysis. Here I was participating
and contributing to the group and just like now, constant personal
attacks for no reason. What Mr X doesn't post is the thousands of
pages of ranting and unfounded personal attacks he waged. I was for
years a professional and on disability at the time innocently
participating in this group. When this terrorist attacks. And, just
like his last post this had nothing to do with trading but personality.
HE SIMPLY CANNOT ARGUE INTELLIGENTLY ON THE TECHNICALS OR ACTUAL
TRADING FACTS. SO HE PULLS A "LIBERAL" .... ATTACKS MUTE POINTS AN
IRRELEVANT PERSONALITY ISSUES. AND TWIST'S THE TRUTH BY NOT POSTING
THE WHOLE STORY.
"Great minds talk about ideas, average minds about events, and little
minds about people." Eleanor Roosevelt. Dragging up responses to
your harassments is a new low for you. Pathetic.
TEDDY ROOSEVELT SAID. IT IS NOT THE CRITIC WHO COUNTS NOR THE MAN WHO
POINTS OUT HOW THE STRONG MAN STUBLED OR WHERE THE DOER OF DEEDS COULD
HAVE DONE THEM BETTER. THE CREDIT BELONGS TO THE MAN WHO IS ACTUALLY
IN THE ARENA..................... HIS PLACE SHALL NEVER BE WITH THOSE
COLD AND TIMID SOULS WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT.
I have made every reasonable attempt and even gone way beyond the call
of duty to give these detractors everything they need to become
informed and at least have some knowledge of what they attack. I've
even offered to pay them to take a look. They have refused. I have no
fear of giving 10 trades or 100 trades. That is nothing, I post 21
charts a day with 20 days plotted in the future on them. Not only that
I've shown I'm very able to give specific profitable trades.
I posted a chart of Crude Oil to this group on May 7th and have posted
other cycle surfer charts as well.
THESE 2 ARE LIKE THE TWO FAT MEN IN THE STANDS WHO COULDN'T WALK 2
FEET AND ARE YELLING OBSCENITIES AT THE ATHELETES WHO HAVE YEARS OF
TRAINING AND ARE GIVING IT THEIR ALL IN THE FIELD OF BATTLE.
WHO DO YOU RESPECT?
THIS IS ABOUT FUTURES TRADING AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS. ISN'T IT FUNNY
HOW THEY CAN'T STAY 0N POINT AND THE PERSONAL ATTACKS ESCALATE AFTER A
SUCESSUL PUBLICALLY POSTED TRADE.
JUST LIKE WHEN I POSTED CHARTS THE ATTACKS WOULD START SO PEOPLE WOULD
FORGET ABOUT THE CHARTS.
DETRACTORS... POST A FEW TRADES. PROVE YOU ARE SOMEONE ANYONE SHOULD
LISTEN TO?
|
|
Posted by on May 27, 2006, 10:44 am
Legan: Those who haven't made mistakes haven't done anything. Albert
Einstien...
** Dale, it detracts from the point you are trying to make when you
misspell then name of the person you are quoting.
Legan: Reading through them it is clear to see I said several times I
just got home from dialysis.
** Despite what you might think, I don't believe anyone here wishes
you bad health. On the other hand, this is not the kind of information
that we need to know and really should not be shared.
Legan: Here I was participating and contributing to the group and just
like now, constant personal attacks for no reason.
** You call telling people to fuck off and threatening to beat them up
contributing? Even I don't think you are that dumb.
Legan: TEDDY ROOSEVELT SAID. IT IS NOT THE CRITIC WHO COUNTS NOR THE
MAN WHOPOINTS OUT HOW THE STRONG MAN STUBLED OR WHERE THE DOER OF DEEDS
COULD HAVE DONE THEM BETTER.
** Writing "stubled" when you mean "stumbled" is good for a
laugh, but also detracts from your point.
Legan: When this terrorist attacks. And, just like his last post this
had nothing to do with trading but personality.
** Ending a sentence in the middle and then continuing it again as if
you were starting a new point gives someone the impression that they
are dealing with an 8th grader. That just can't help either.
Legan: DETRACTORS... POST A FEW TRADES. PROVE YOU ARE SOMEONE ANYONE
SHOULD LISTEN TO?
** There is so much that you just don't get, the most important of
which is that I am not selling anything, so have nothing to prove. You
ARE trying to sell something, so you DO have something to prove.
And when you post only 5 hours after announcing to the world that would
not post here again, how do you expect to be taken seriously?
|
|
Posted by Trade2Succeed on May 27, 2006, 1:23 pm
If you are going to correct the spelling of others, then perhaps you should
start with yourself.
"...misspell then name of..."
S/B "...misspell THE name of..."
A public service message....
> Legan: Those who haven't made mistakes haven't done anything. Albert
> Einstien...
>
> ** Dale, it detracts from the point you are trying to make when you
> misspell then name of the person you are quoting.
>
|
|
Posted by Trade2Succeed on May 27, 2006, 1:35 pm
There is so much 'you' don't get as well, Mr. Blooper.
The fact that you are not selling anything does not justify the flames.
While someone who has something to sell has the burden of getting his
message across, you have the freedom to decide whether it is something you
want. Trashing something you know nothing about is not justified by the mere
fact that you have nothing worth selling.
The only reason you bash sellers here is that you can do so anonymously. You
feel shielded from any backlash for your obviously bad behavior. If you
think your behavior is justified, then why don't you just bash every
retailer you run into at the Mall or fast food joint? See how far you will
get doing that.
I'm sure there are lots of products you would not buy only because it
doesn't fit what you want. But do you jump into your car and start bashing
those retailers by posting your negative messages on their store front
windows? Do you picket their stores?
It is one thing to complain about a product YOU PAID FOR and not given what
was advertised. It is another to complain about something you never
purchased.
Your replies to Mr. Legan demonstrates that you are trying to appear
logical. Then why not show that logic by not acting like a newsgroup bully
doing something you know well you would not do in public without the shield
of anonimity.
Feel free to correct any spelling mistakes you find. I have no time to
proofread it for you.
-R
> ** There is so much that you just don't get, the most important of
> which is that I am not selling anything, so have nothing to prove. You
> ARE trying to sell something, so you DO have something to prove.
|
|
Posted by on May 27, 2006, 2:34 pm
Ratchford: If you are going to correct the spelling of others, then
perhaps you should
start with yourself."...misspell then name of..."S/B "...misspell THE
name of..."
** I stand corrected, although that is clearly a typo and not a
misspelling. Nevertheless, it bothers me to see mistakes in things I
write that appear in a public forum.
Ratchford: The fact that you are not selling anything does not justify
the flames. While someone who has something to sell has the burden of
getting his message across, you have the freedom to decide whether it
is something you want. Trashing something you know nothing about is not
justified by the mere fact that you have nothing worth selling.
** My comments to Dale have been about his manners, his crudeness, his
language, his absurd cockiness, and his complete and total inability to
make his case without sounding like a thug. Clearly, many of those
things have bothered you as well and it is obvious you have tried to
distance yourself from him in many areas.
Ratchford: The only reason you bash sellers here is that you can do so
anonymously.
** Wrong. The ONLY sellers I have EVER even commented on are you and
Dale. And based on the literally thousands and thousands of negative
posts that have been directed at you over the years, I am far from
being alone.
Ratchford: If you think your behavior is justified, then why don't you
just bash every retailer you run into at the Mall or fast food joint?
See how far you will get doing that.
** See above.
Ratchford: I'm sure there are lots of products you would not buy only
because it doesn't fit what you want. But do you jump into your car and
start bashing those retailers by posting your negative messages on
their store front windows? Do you picket their stores?
** You are just talking to talk, since none of what you are saying is
relevant.
Ratchford: Your replies to Mr. Legan demonstrates that you are trying
to appear logical. Then why not show that logic by not acting like a
newsgroup bully doing something you know well you would not do in
public without the shield of anonimity.
** You are suffering from selective hearing.
Ratchford: Feel free to correct any spelling mistakes you find. I have
no time to proofread it for you.
** Thanks. That is "anonymity," not "anonimity" ... and you were
doing so well until then!
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Need Help with your S&P Trades? | November 14, 2006, 9:49 pm |
| Need Help with your S&P Trades? | May 2, 2008, 6:20 pm |
| 10 Trades / AD / DJ / CT / Corn | May 26, 2006, 12:30 am |
| Need Help with your S&P position trades? | June 8, 2008, 8:02 pm |
| Facts about FDATE TRADES | September 21, 2007, 3:10 am |
| 12 wins out of 15 trades in SP500 | November 15, 2007, 11:42 pm |
| Commodity Option Trades | August 8, 2006, 5:39 am |
| SP Forecaster and Intraday Trades | October 16, 2006, 5:57 pm |
| HOW TO PICK PROFITABLE TRADES | January 21, 2007, 6:52 pm |
| More FDate Profitable Trades | June 13, 2007, 8:37 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap