whole life insurance numbers

Financial Planning - Financial planning in general. (Moderated) 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
whole life insurance numbers P.Schuman 11-13-2006
Posted by P.Schuman on November 13, 2006, 5:02 am
A neighbor has $100k in whole life,
and has had it for several years.
(We were chatting about our 16yr olds
& college savings)

As I recall, these policies are basically "forced savings"
with the death benefit tacked on.

Any comments on his policy numbers that I copied below ?

$104,000 basic whole life
$2,000 yearly premium x 15yrs = $30,000 paid into policy
$138,000 current value

$34,000 total from dividends
$4,767 current year cash value increase
$1,935 current year dividends


Posted by Cal on November 13, 2006, 2:01 pm

>
> As I recall, these policies are basically "forced savings"
> with the death benefit tacked on.
>
> Any comments on his policy numbers that I copied below ?
>
> $104,000 basic whole life
> $2,000 yearly premium x 15yrs = $30,000 paid into policy
> $138,000 current value
>
> $34,000 total from dividends
> $4,767 current year cash value increase
> $1,935 current year dividends

As you can see, from the numbers that you have posted, the Current Interest
is almost equal to the current cost. However, you neglected to show the
Current
Increase In Cash Value. Each year there is an Increase in the Cash Value in
addition to the dividend. Therefore, the TOTAL value INCREASE of the
contract
will EXCEED this years cost.

To have had coverage of 100K for 15 years, and at the same time to show
an INCREASE in the Cash Value of over 100k seems to be too high, but if
correct it is FANTASTIC.......
Cal Lester CLU


the


Posted by joetaxpayer on November 13, 2006, 2:35 pm


Cal wrote:

> >
>
>>As I recall, these policies are basically "forced savings"
>>with the death benefit tacked on.
>>
>>Any comments on his policy numbers that I copied below ?
>>
>>$104,000 basic whole life
>> $2,000 yearly premium x 15yrs = $30,000 paid into policy
>>$138,000 current value
>>
>>$34,000 total from dividends
>> $4,767 current year cash value increase
>> $1,935 current year dividends
>
>
> As you can see, from the numbers that you have posted, the Current Interest
> is almost equal to the current cost. However, you neglected to show the
> Current Increase In Cash Value. Each year there is an Increase in the Cash
Value in
> addition to the dividend. Therefore, the TOTAL value INCREASE of the
> contract will EXCEED this years cost.
>
> To have had coverage of 100K for 15 years, and at the same time to show
> an INCREASE in the Cash Value of over 100k seems to be too high, but if
> correct it is FANTASTIC.......
> Cal Lester CLU

OP said current cash value increase is $4767. $138K current value I read
as $100K death benefit, $38,000 cash value. If in fact the cash value
were $138K, the annual return on the $2K/yr would be over 15% per year.
Very unlikely. Do you read this differently?
JOE


Posted by P.Schuman on November 13, 2006, 4:02 pm
from my scribbled notes,
the policy death benefit is $138k
the policy cash value is $46k

$4767 cash increase this year
$1935 2006 div

$2000 yearly prems for 15yrs

So - for your invested $30k, you get $46k (over 15 yrs)
plus purchased death benefit.
Wonder how the classical comparison looks
of invested a portion of the $2000 + buying a Term policy...
I think my Term is $500 per $125k of coverage.

Any general comments I can take back to him
when I see him at swim team...


Posted by Cal on November 13, 2006, 4:58 pm

> from my scribbled notes,
> the policy death benefit is $138k
> the policy cash value is $46k
>
> $4767 cash increase this year
> $1935 2006 div
>
> $2000 yearly prems for 15yrs
>
> So - for your invested $30k, you get $46k (over 15 yrs)
> plus purchased death benefit.
> Wonder how the classical comparison looks
> of invested a portion of the $2000 + buying a Term policy...
> I think my Term is $500 per $125k of coverage.
>
> Any general comments I can take back to him
> when I see him at swim team...

This is more reasonable. As you can see from your new figures,
there was a RETURN on your $2000 of premium for this year ALONE
of $6702 PLUS having the insurance In-Force. Next years reurned
should in all probability be even higher.
Cal Lester CLU


>


Similar ThreadsPosted
Life insurance in 401(k)-PSP November 29, 2006, 11:53 am
Do I need life insurance? October 31, 2007, 5:15 pm
Life insurance exclusions November 10, 2006, 2:03 pm
Term Life Insurance November 13, 2006, 2:01 pm
Re: Life Insurance Annuity August 13, 2007, 3:50 pm
"Paid Up" Whole life Insurance August 25, 2007, 7:50 pm
Term Life Insurance October 1, 2007, 2:33 pm
Life Insurance Beneficiary November 3, 2007, 6:55 am
Life insurance ownership November 14, 2007, 3:24 pm
Life Insurance Options January 14, 2008, 7:18 pm

other essential online resources:
United States Treasury
US Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Stock Exchange
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Accounting and Tax Software Forums

Contact Us | Privacy Policy   XML SitemapXML Sitemap