portfolio allocation low hanging fruit

Financial Planning - Financial planning in general. (Moderated) 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
portfolio allocation low hanging fruit notme@nospam.com 05-04-2007
Posted by notme@nospam.com on May 4, 2007, 5:05 am
Looking for someone to tell me what's wrong or right about this picture.

I recently used this "Morningstar X-Ray Analysis" feature on holdings
across several institutions. Looking at top 90% of total investment, it
shows me this:

Percent        Category                YTD Return %
of Tot

41        Cash        
9        Large Blend                  6
9        Large Growth                  7
8        Foreign Large Growth          9
7        Intermediate-Term Bond          2
4        Large Growth                  7
4        Large Value                  7
4        Large Value                  7
2        Europe Stock                 11
2        Large Blend                  8


The cash is all in regular money market and CD's earning 5% interest,
the rest is all mutual funds in IRA's (about 15% Roth, 85% traditional).

Suppose for the next year the idea is to maintain roughly the status
quo, although the cash percent could go down to maybe 35% and overall
risk (growth potential) could go up a little. Tax bracket is currently
15% federal. Planning to convert maybe 5% of traditional IRA total to
Roth IRA this year as long as it doesn't increase tax bracket.

Is there any obvious way to juggle things around to reduce expenses or
increase tax benefits?

Would purchasing ETF's with either the cash or from within the IRA's (by
selling mutual funds) have any particular advantage?

For example, if there is going to be so much cash earning taxable
interest, is there any point in also have money in a Trad. IRA bond fund?

Does it cost more to have multiple funds in each category (for example,
two "Large Blend", two "Large Growth", two "Large Value"?

It says avg. mutual fund expense ratio is 0.69, then "expense ratio of
similarly weighted hypothetical portfolio" is 1.35. What does this mean?

TIA!


Posted by notme@nospam.com on May 30, 2007, 4:59 am
OK, maybe there's just one question I could get an answer to?

notme@nospam.com wrote:
> Looking for someone to tell me what's wrong or right about this picture.
>

>
> It says avg. mutual fund expense ratio is 0.69, then "expense ratio of
> similarly weighted hypothetical portfolio" is 1.35. What does this mean?
>
> TIA!
>


Posted by Sandra Loosemore on May 30, 2007, 9:47 am

> > It says avg. mutual fund expense ratio is 0.69, then "expense ratio
> > of similarly weighted hypothetical portfolio" is 1.35. What does
> > this mean?
> > TIA!

It means that you've chosen less expensive funds than average, which is
a good thing. :-)

-Sandra the cynic


Posted by jIM on May 30, 2007, 9:56 am
> OK, maybe there's just one question I could get an answer to?
>
>
>
> n...@nospam.com wrote:
> > Looking for someone to tell me what's wrong or right about this picture.
>
> > It says avg. mutual fund expense ratio is 0.69, then "expense ratio of
> > similarly weighted hypothetical portfolio" is 1.35. What does this mean?
>
> >

I never saw original post. Your expense ratio is "below average".
More than likely the x-ray took avg expense ratios for funds in each
category and created avgs. IMO anything under 1% is OK and under .5%
is excellent.


Posted by on June 13, 2007, 7:06 pm


Looking for someone to tell me what's wrong or right about this
picture.
>
> I recently used this "Morningstar X-Ray Analysis" feature on holdings
> across several institutions. Looking at top 90% of total investment, it
> shows me this:
>
> Percent Category YTD Return %
> of Tot
>
> 41 Cash
> 9 Large Blend 6
> 9 Large Growth 7
> 8 Foreign Large Growth 9
> 7 Intermediate-Term Bond 2
> 4 Large Growth 7
> 4 Large Value 7
> 4 Large Value 7
> 2 Europe Stock 11
> 2 Large Blend 8
>
> The cash is all in regular money market and CD's earning 5% interest,
> the rest is all mutual funds in IRA's (about 15% Roth, 85% traditional).
>
> Suppose for the next year the idea is to maintain roughly the status
> quo, although the cash percent could go down to maybe 35% and overall
> risk (growth potential) could go up a little. Tax bracket is currently
> 15% federal. Planning to convert maybe 5% of traditional IRA total to
> Roth IRA this year as long as it doesn't increase tax bracket.
>
> Is there any obvious way to juggle things around to reduce expenses or
> increase tax benefits?
>
> Would purchasing ETF's with either the cash or from within the IRA's (by
> selling mutual funds) have any particular advantage?
>
> For example, if there is going to be so much cash earning taxable
> interest, is there any point in also have money in a Trad. IRA bond fund?
>
> Does it cost more to have multiple funds in each category (for example,
> two "Large Blend", two "Large Growth", two "Large Value"?
>
> It says avg. mutual fund expense ratio is 0.69, then "expense ratio of
> similarly weighted hypothetical portfolio" is 1.35. What does this mean?
>
> TIA!

If you have 41% in Money Market you have way too much lazy money.
The Morningstar X-ray over-compartmentalizes but here's a simple
moderate-growth focus asset allocation plan

About 40% Large Cap (I like Value over Growth but that's me...Growth
should start doing better soon)
20% Mid-cap
10% Small Cap
20% Bond
10% Real estate

Keep enough cash in MMKT for emergency spending needs. If you have any
major expenses in next two years (wedding, school, vacation) put it in
a CD.


======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
Please trim the post to which you are responding. "Trim" means that except for
a FEW lines to add context, the previous post is deleted.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Portfolio Allocation November 22, 2006, 7:43 pm
portfolio April 15, 2008, 11:55 am
Need some help with allocation? September 23, 2008, 8:19 am
Consolidate Portfolio? October 21, 2006, 6:12 am
Building an ETF portfolio... November 1, 2006, 4:59 am
Portfolio Management March 28, 2007, 10:55 am
need portfolio advice May 29, 2007, 12:10 pm
Re: Rebalancing Portfolio September 21, 2007, 7:10 pm
Asset Allocation and MVO May 16, 2007, 7:12 pm
Portfolio Optimization Software? February 20, 2007, 5:02 am

other essential online resources:
United States Treasury
US Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Stock Exchange
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Accounting and Tax Software Forums

Contact Us | Privacy Policy   XML SitemapXML Sitemap