|
Posted by Elle on February 24, 2007, 9:32 am
>
>> Bear in mind the conventional wisdom is to have about six
>> months to a year or so of living expenses in a money
>> market
>> fund or similar, for emergencies. What's left may be
>> invested for retirement, a downpayment on a house,
>> whatever.
>
> This is an example of why "conventional wisdom" is often
> such
> a bad idea. Having 6 months worth of living expenses
> stuck
> in a poor performing investment is financial stupidity.
> Life
> is short, and money only has value over time. Once you
> lose
> this time, the value is gone for good. A far better idea
> is
> to invest this money, put it to its highest and best use,
> and
> come up with an alternative to meet those occasional
> emergencies.
> Having a credit card, home equity line of credit, and
> checking
> account with overdraft protection are great tools for such
> occasions.
I think what you list are horrible tools, because (1) the
interest rates are ridiculous; and (2) current money market
rates at reputable institutions are about 5%.
> They are all relatively inexpensive, charge only
> when used, and can be paid back over time or by tapping
> into
> your investments at a convenient time.
If there is a market downturn, this "convenient" time may
not be for years, during which time one racks up a hefty
credit card interest bill.
There are a lot of ways to finagle one's finances so this
"emergency fund" is always there as a buffer, yet is doing
more than just sitting there.
I don't have a strong objection to using one's contributions
to a Roth IRA as at least part of an emergency fund, either,
since contributions may be withdrawn penalty-free at any
time.
Otherwise, we disagree, strongly. And don't go calling
people's comments "stupid." That's not constructive, duh.
|