interesting way to game social security

Financial Planning - Financial planning in general. (Moderated) 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
interesting way to game social security rick++ 02-18-2008
Posted by Douglas Johnson on February 26, 2008, 1:22 pm

>
>
>>
>> The other thing you need to do is keep careful tax records. To get the
>> tax
>> credit on the repayment, you need to figure your taxes with and without
>> Social
>> Security on every year you have received SS before the repayment year.
>>
>
>I think this is the part of the "game" that I'd look forward to the most.

With TurboTax or equivalent, this is easy. Without them, it would be a real PIA
for all but the simplest returns.
-- Doug

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Posted by L on February 27, 2008, 5:25 am
> in benefits is really only $360/mo. in terms of monthly income.
>
> Also, assuming you are rich and don't need the money,  then to repay
> yourself the $96,000 using the entire increased benefit of $760/mo., my
> investment calculator says that it would take almost 9 years (again
> assuming 5% interest and monthly compounding of interest).  If only the
> real increase of $360/mo. was used it would take over 15 years.  
>
> In the mean time, if the $96,000 had been left untouched at 5% yearly
> interest for 15 years you would end up with about $200,000, an increase
> of $104,000, so it doesn't seem to me that there is much benefit until
> sometime after the break even point of about 14-15 years -- and you
> would be about 84 years old.  If you die much before that, the
> government wins.  
>

> --
> -Ernie-
>
> --------------------------------------
>Well I think that what has been overlooked is the impact on one spouse income
if they claim against the other, e.g., claim against say 20K verse waiting
until he gets seventy and they claiming against him.


--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Posted by Douglas Johnson on March 6, 2008, 4:35 pm

>Article claims you can withdraw a previous application
>for social security, pay back 100%, then reapply with
>updated-age benefits. Thats is, you apply at age 62,
>bank the checks, they re-apply at age 65 or 70 and
>get a stepped-up penison. Plus keep returns on
>banked payments so far.
>
>http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/5546299.html


Here is one more way to play the game. According to:

http://finance.yahoo.com/focus-retirement/article/104500/Bewildering-Benefits;_ylt=AsP35SBRic_2_HuGSB6ttZS7YWsA?mod=retirement-preparation

Quoting the relevant section:

"Let's say Ted and Alice are the same age. He's eligible for a $2,000 benefit at
his full retirement age; she's eligible for $1,000 at hers. Alice claims
benefits based on her earnings at age 62 and gets $750; Ted, meanwhile, is
considering waiting until age 70, to try to maximize their benefits. The problem
is that 70 is a long time to wait to start receiving benefits.

At full retirement age, though, Social Security gives a person two choices: You
can take your own benefit, or -- if eligible -- you can collect just a spousal
benefit, and then claim your own benefit at a later date. Thus, if Ted (at full
retirement age) takes his spousal benefit based on Alice's earnings, Social
Security would award him $500, or half of Alice's projected benefit at her full
retirement age. Then, at some future date, Ted can ask Social Security for
benefits based on his earnings. (At age 70, Ted would qualify for about $2,640 a
month.)"

-- Doug

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Social Security questions September 5, 2007, 5:08 pm
Social Security Redux September 24, 2007, 2:35 pm
Social Security Confusion October 11, 2007, 12:24 pm
Social Security Rate of Return January 29, 2007, 5:47 pm
SOCIAL SECURITY THREAD CLOSED February 2, 2007, 1:42 pm
Social Security Spouse Benefit April 26, 2007, 10:42 am
Social Security survivors benefit April 30, 2008, 7:19 pm
future Social Security benefits and taxes December 7, 2006, 10:11 am
Optimizing Social Security Benefit withdrawal February 9, 2007, 12:34 pm
Thread Closed (was: Social Security Rate of Return) February 2, 2007, 8:48 am

other essential online resources:
United States Treasury
US Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Stock Exchange
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Accounting and Tax Software Forums

Contact Us | Privacy Policy   XML SitemapXML Sitemap