causes of subprime crisis

Financial Planning - Financial planning in general. (Moderated) 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
causes of subprime crisis Beliavsky 10-30-2007
Posted by Beliavsky on October 30, 2007, 9:26 am
http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell103007.php3
Jewish World Review Oct. 30, 2007
Political 'solutions'
by Thomas Sowell

'Why were borrowers taking out risky loans in the first place? And why
were lenders willing to lend to risky borrowers? In both cases, the
government was a prime factor in "subprime" loans.

Many people took out risky mortgage loans to buy a house because
housing prices were so high that this was the only way they could own
a home. Where housing prices were highest, the most people took out
risky loans.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, where housing prices are the highest in
the nation, risky interest-only loans went from being 11 percent of
all new mortgages in 2002 to being 66 percent of all new mortgages in
2005.

Study after study has shown that housing prices are highest where
government restrictions on building are the most severe. That is the
ugly result of pretty words like "open space."

Why were lenders lending to people whose prospects of repaying the
loans were below average - that is, "subprime"?

Government laws and policies, especially the Community Reinvestment
Act, pressured lenders to invest in people and places where they would
not invest otherwise. Government also created the temporarily very low
interest rates that made the mortgages seem affordable for the moment.'


Posted by bondguy1824 on October 31, 2007, 5:15 pm
> http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell103007.php3
> Jewish World Review Oct. 30, 2007
> Political 'solutions'
> by Thomas Sowell
>
> 'Why were borrowers taking out risky loans in the first place? And why
> were lenders willing to lend to risky borrowers? In both cases, the
> government was a prime factor in "subprime" loans.
>
You can say that the government is primarily responsible for what is
going on, but let's face it. There were people out there getting
mortgages they couldn't afford to buy property that was too expensive
for them or speculators bidding up properties on the unrealistic
expectation that property prices were on a one way ticket to the
moon. This is a classic bubble. Mortgagee and mortgagors alike have
to pay the price. Restructure these mortgages to reflect the reality
of today's market and move on


Similar ThreadsPosted
what's the fuss about subprime crisis? August 11, 2007, 3:59 am
deregulation and the current credit crisis September 22, 2008, 1:00 pm
Money Markets and the Current Financial Crisis July 15, 2008, 12:05 pm
A Good Look at the Subprime Mess October 27, 2007, 1:52 pm
Finding info on bank's subprime exposure? January 9, 2008, 3:04 pm

other essential online resources:
United States Treasury
US Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Stock Exchange
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Accounting and Tax Software Forums

Contact Us | Privacy Policy   XML SitemapXML Sitemap