|
Posted by ps56k on April 30, 2009, 1:39 pm
>
>> I've been reading the threads about bond funds,
>> and currently am holding VBMFX in my portfolio.
>>
>> What about FGOVX -
>> http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=FGOVX&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=vbmfx
>>
>> Why the divergence over the past year ?
>
> Look at the assets inside the funds. We often talk here
> of asset allocation and asset classes and just treat "bond"
> or "fixed-income" as a thing unto itself. It's more
> complicated than that.
>
> Last year, US Treasury bonds rallied as everyone sold
> everything else in the universe and bought them. In the
> process the sold off not just stocks but also other kinds
> of fixed-income securities - especially corporates.
>
> VBMFX has a substantial portion invested in corporates and
> a smaller allocation to treasuries and agencies than does
> FGOVX. That's the main difference. FGOVX has no corporates
> at all. They are both in the highest grade securities, have
> average maturities on the order of 5 or so years (one just
> above that, one just below).
>
Back in 2006, I was holding both Vanguard VFIIX (GNMA)
and the LT Corp fund - VWESX.
Didn't feel comfortable at the time, with the housing mess on the horizon.
Sold them both - and put some into the index VBMFX,
not sure where the rest went :)
Looking back -
wonder if I should have kept GNMA vs going to the bond index ?
(selling the LT corp was probably a good move)
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=VFIIX&t=2y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=vwesx,vbmfx,fgovx
What about now and FGOVX -
invest a portion in full treasuries,
or it's a safety bubble ready to pop,
as folks trickle back to equities ?
|