|
Posted by Otis on June 22, 2008, 7:35 am
Does anybody know the real deal on Nevada annuity premium taxes?
According to this page:
http://www.jhancockrealestate.com/gsfp/annuities/annuity_education.html qualified money is not taxed, but non-qualified is. That would be double
taxation, wouldn't it?
This page: http://www.annuity.info/premtax.cfm says just the opposite.
This news article:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Mar-23-Wed-2005/business/883116.html confuses me. It seems to be saying that non-qualified annuities are not
taxed. Except the last sentence seem to imply that if your employer sets you
up with an annuity from your qualified funds, you're home free. What if your
employer offers an annuity inside it's retirement plan, the way
http://www.incomesolutions.com works, and you, the employee, elect that
annuity?
--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.
|
|
Posted by Elle on June 24, 2008, 10:02 am
Otis, try asking this at misc.taxes.moderated .
--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.
|
|
Posted by Otis on June 24, 2008, 7:16 pm
Thanks for the advice. After considerable searching I found this:
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/74th/Minutes/Senate/CL/Final/275.pdf which is a discussion of State Senate Bill 12 (the newspaper article said it
was Bill 176 ???) which would repeal the tax (fat chance) and it repeatedly
says Qualified funds are not subject to the tax.
--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Equity Premium | January 1, 2007, 6:02 am |
| medicare premium based on pre-retirement income? | August 10, 2007, 9:55 am |
| Great book on Equity Risk Premium: Goetzmann and Ibbotson | November 28, 2006, 1:02 pm |
| cd's & taxes | October 17, 2006, 12:33 pm |
| IRA penalty and taxes | January 4, 2007, 4:59 am |
| Taxes in Retirement...1%? | April 17, 2007, 6:07 pm |
| EAFE and foreign taxes | April 11, 2007, 2:39 pm |
| CD's maturing and taxes | October 29, 2008, 3:55 pm |
| taxes and corporate bond yields | September 4, 2007, 3:06 pm |
| Finding out fund's fees and taxes | March 15, 2008, 3:55 pm |
|
|