|
Posted by on December 8, 2006, 5:16 pm
Hi All,
I am new to investing and my financial advisor suggested Curian a
separately managed account may benefit me more than mutual funds. Any
advise, guidance and insight about separately managed accounts would be
very
helpful.
Thanks
anand
|
|
Posted by joetaxpayer on December 8, 2006, 5:56 pm
anandsekar@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am new to investing and my financial advisor suggested Curian a
> separately managed account may benefit me more than mutual funds. Any
> advise, guidance and insight about separately managed accounts would be
> very
> helpful.
>
> Thanks
> anand
>
I smell high fees. A high expense product you will pay someone
handsomely to sell you. A Google of Curian led me to their web page, and
it says that they are a division of Jackson National Life Insurance.
Spend more time with this advisor and I'm thinking you're going to walk
away with a variable annuity.
Read the books - http://www.joetaxpayer.com/book.html
Learn about asset allocation -
http://home.earthlink.net/~elle_navorski/id8.html
And understand that excess fees over the long term are a growth killer.
JOE
|
|
Posted by Will Trice on December 9, 2006, 6:50 pm
joetaxpayer wrote:
>
>
> anandsekar@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am new to investing and my financial advisor suggested Curian a
>> separately managed account may benefit me more than mutual funds. Any
>> advise, guidance and insight about separately managed accounts would be
>> very
>> helpful.
> I smell high fees. A high expense product you will pay someone
> handsomely to sell you. A Google of Curian led me to their web page, and
> it says that they are a division of Jackson National Life Insurance.
> Spend more time with this advisor and I'm thinking you're going to walk
> away with a variable annuity.
Non-insurance-selling financial advisors also pitch Curian. In fact,
just such a pitch was the impetus for me to participate in this newsgroup.
I received a full workup from an FP suggesting Curian. After filling
out all the survey material, I was classed as a "Very Aggressive"
investor with a risk tolerance score of 95 out of 100. So far so good.
The main selling point of their plan was that I would get a better
return net of expenses, despite the fact that the wrap fee they wanted
to charge me was 2.4%, because of their great team of investment
managers. Their fee was supposedly inclusive of all costs including
trading costs and such that are not reported by mutual funds within
their expense ratio. So they worked up the costs of the mutual funds I
was holding at the time to show me what I was really paying. 2 out of
my three funds were still less expensive than Curian's wrap rate. Hmm...
I also received a target asset allocation plan that was optimized for my
risk tolerance. Their allocation plan, not surprisingly, was radically
different than the allocation I had at the time (and probably now as
well, I don't allocate intentionally). But if you took most of the
blend allocation of the S&P 500 (when looking at a 9-cell asset
allocation matrix a la Morningstar), divided it evenly, and plopped one
half into the growth cells and one half into the value cells, while
maintaining the allocations based on company size, you got my
recommended asset allocation. That is, pretty durn near the S&P 500,
except with very little of the blend category. This made me a bit
nervous - paying 2.4% to get a closet S&P 500 index fund.
But maybe my account would fare better than the mutual funds I held at
the time, net of expenses. After all, I did have one fund that had
higher expenses, right? Well, Curian projected my future returns using
their allocation and managers, before expenses, at 9%. They projected
the expected return of my existing mutual fund portfolio at 12%. After
expenses, even my high expense mutual fund was projected to stomp their
account. Why would I use them? I didn't.
That was only two years ago and I don't know how their exact allocation
performed, but my portfolio has stomped the S&P 500 since I received
their pitch. And I measure the performance of my portfolio *after
expenses*.
YMMV,
-Will
|
|
Posted by joetaxpayer on December 9, 2006, 7:32 pm
Will Trice wrote:
>
>
> joetaxpayer wrote:
>
>> anandsekar@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>> I am new to investing and my financial advisor suggested Curian a
>>> separately managed account may benefit me more than mutual funds. Any
>>> advise, guidance and insight about separately managed accounts would be
>>> very
>>> helpful.
>
>
>> I smell high fees. A high expense product you will pay someone
>> handsomely to sell you.
>
> The main selling point of their plan was that I would get a better
> return net of expenses, despite the fact that the wrap fee they wanted
> to charge me was 2.4%, because of their great team of investment
> managers.
> -Will
So my instinct was right? I don't begrudge the 1% planners their fees.
But it seems to me that given the fact that fewer than half of any
manager can beat the average (50% should, but after trading expenses, it
would have to be less) that a 2.4% drag would shift the chances of
matching market returns to something less than 45%, and over time, less
than that.
JOE
|
|
Posted by on December 9, 2006, 2:41 am
I went to Curian's website and looked through their literature. The
idea looks to be in exchange for higher fees (typical +2%), you might
sleep better at night knowing professionals are managing your money. My
personal opinion: the products/services offered aren't that unique --
they sound like target funds except your money is kept separate from
other shareholders.
anandsekar@gmail.com wrote:
> I am new to investing and my financial advisor suggested Curian a
> separately managed account may benefit me more than mutual funds. Any
> advise, guidance and insight about separately managed accounts would be
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Age 70.5 and Required Minimum Distribution Affecting Retirement Accounts | October 5, 2008, 11:00 am |
| Tax Managed Accounts | November 25, 2008, 4:56 pm |
| IRA distributions not required in 2009 (pending) | December 12, 2008, 7:08 pm |
| Guidance on managing $s | December 7, 2006, 2:22 pm |
| Need some guidance as a young investor. | November 14, 2007, 5:06 am |
| Annuity vs Managed Payout | June 9, 2008, 7:02 pm |
| Professionally managed 401K? | August 28, 2008, 5:04 am |
| Managed Payout Mutual Funds | April 26, 2008, 12:43 pm |
| Which styles of actively managed stock mutual funds outperform? | January 22, 2008, 11:19 am |
| Combining various IRA Accounts | November 19, 2007, 3:13 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap