Economics of retaining an older car, versus a buying a new car

Financial Planning - Financial planning in general. (Moderated) 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Economics of retaining an older car, versus a buying a new car Bhoot Nath 07-05-2008
Posted by Ron Peterson on July 5, 2008, 9:56 pm

> The car is probbaly worth 3500 due to mileage + usual wear and tear
> after 14 years (& some dings), but no mechanical problem. We would
> like to keep this car (we are not itching for a new car smell), but
> does it make sense to put $3000 into a $3500 car? How critical is to
> replace timing belt and water pump stuff every 90K?

Mark Bole has some good advice.

Newer cars are safer with better brakes, air bags, and stability
control.

If you are in an accident, you won't get more than the blue book
value. But, don't drop collision or uninsured motorist or you may
never be able to collect.

--
Ron

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Posted by Daniel T. on July 5, 2008, 10:15 pm

> My wife and I are planner, saver types; we also had good fortune of
> being born to families who stressed hard work and education and as a
> result, we both have good careers, and have become financially
> comfortable, without any inheritance :) Spouse was able to switch to
> 1/2 time, as one child started kindergarten last year, and seocnd will
> start next year.
>
> One of the elements of frugal planning is that, until we got quite
> secure, we only buy what we needed, not what is advertised. So we
> stayed, 1 car family, from 1996 thorugh 2004. During this time, the
> 1996 model Honda civic was driven an average of 25K miles/year. In
> 2004 we got another car (smallest SUV), and since then the 1996 civic
> has been driven about 4K/year.
>
> I have done every scheduled maintenance, without fail, and oil changes
> all along, so the car runs (and has always run) without any issues,
> and the emissions are very low, always only 2% to 5% of the levels
> required for SMOG. So that's not at issue.

What you are saying above is that there is absolutely no reason to get
rid of the car. As such, I'm not sure why you are even asking the
question.

> Now the civic paint is peeling, and a cheap repainting at Maaco is
> estimated at $800.

If they have any idea what they are doing, even a cheep paint job should
last 4+ years. That's $200 a year.

> The car will hit 180K miles in a few weeks, and is
> due for the major maintenance + the timing belt + water pump stuff
> that is done at every 90K miles. All of this is estimated to be about
> $1500.

So this $1500 investment should last 90K miles, at 4K miles/year, that's
$67 per year.

> I estimate tires and brakes also, probably within a year, for
> another $700 or more.

All of which should last at least 40K miles or $70/year.

You are griping because the car cost $337 per year in maintenance?

> The car is probbaly worth 3500 due to mileage + usual wear and tear
> after 14 years (& some dings), but no mechanical problem. We would
> like to keep this car (we are not itching for a new car smell), but
> does it make sense to put $3000 into a $3500 car?

Let's outline two options.

1) You invest the $3K into this car and it will be worth maybe $1600 in
5 years. Total cost $4.9K

2) You invest $10K into a very good used car which will be worth $4400
in five years. Total cost $5.6K. Or maybe you end up buying a car that
has hidden problems and it cost you even more...

I say go with the devil you know, and think about what that little Honda
would look like if you dumped the full $10K into it! It could end up on
the cover of magazines!

> How critical is to
> replace timing belt and water pump stuff every 90K?

The timing belt and water pump could probably last another 10 years at
the rate you drive the car, but if the timing belt goes out, the car is
done for.

> We can afford a new car, without loan, and it won't impact our other
> savings, yada, yada, but I feel crummey having to "throw-away" a
> perfectly good car...

Well hell. If you can afford it and it won't impact your savings, then
get a new car. Instead of throwing away the old one, give it to a worthy
cause and take a tax deduction while feeling good about giving.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Posted by Pete on July 6, 2008, 7:30 am
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:15:08 -0500, Bhoot Nath wrote:

> My wife and I are planner, saver types; we also had good fortune of
> being born to families who stressed hard work and education and as a
> result, we both have good careers, and have become financially
> comfortable, without any inheritance :) Spouse was able to switch to
> 1/2 time, as one child started kindergarten last year, and seocnd will
> start next year.
>
> One of the elements of frugal planning is that, until we got quite
> secure, we only buy what we needed, not what is advertised. So we
> stayed, 1 car family, from 1996 thorugh 2004. During this time, the
> 1996 model Honda civic was driven an average of 25K miles/year. In
> 2004 we got another car (smallest SUV), and since then the 1996 civic
> has been driven about 4K/year.
>
> I have done every scheduled maintenance, without fail, and oil changes
> all along, so the car runs (and has always run) without any issues,
> and the emissions are very low, always only 2% to 5% of the levels
> required for SMOG. So that's not at issue.
>
> Now the civic paint is peeling, and a cheap repainting at Maaco is
> estimated at $800. The car will hit 180K miles in a few weeks, and is
> due for the major maintenance + the timing belt + water pump stuff
> that is done at every 90K miles. All of this is estimated to be about
> $1500. I estimate tires and brakes also, probably within a year, for
> another $700 or more. So, within a year, it will add up to
> $800+1500+700 = about $3000.
>
> The car is probbaly worth 3500 due to mileage + usual wear and tear
> after 14 years (& some dings), but no mechanical problem. We would
> like to keep this car (we are not itching for a new car smell), but
> does it make sense to put $3000 into a $3500 car? How critical is to
> replace timing belt and water pump stuff every 90K?
>
> We can afford a new car, without loan, and it won't impact our other
> savings, yada, yada, but I feel crummey having to "throw-away" a
> perfectly good car...
>
> I would appreciate how prudent people who post on this newsgroup make
> such decisions...

Another reason I heard recently for hanging on to an old car, or buying a
*used* one, is that it takes the equivalent of 1,000 gallons of gas/petrol
to make a new car.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Posted by Augustine on July 7, 2008, 11:57 am
>
> Another reason I heard recently for hanging on to an old car, or buying a
> *used* one, is that it takes the equivalent of 1,000 gallons of gas/petrol
> to make a new car.

Which means absolutely nothing. The energy used to build it might
have come from solar or wind plants and it would still be equivalent
to 1000gals. of gas.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Posted by Daniel T. on July 7, 2008, 10:56 pm
> >
> > Another reason I heard recently for hanging on to an old car, or buying a
> > *used* one, is that it takes the equivalent of 1,000 gallons of gas/petrol
> > to make a new car.
>
> Which means absolutely nothing. The energy used to build it might
> have come from solar or wind plants and it would still be equivalent
> to 1000gals. of gas.

And no matter the source, 15,9375,000 BTUs of energy is 15,9375,000 BTUs
of energy. Personally, I expect that a car's construction uses
considerably more energy than that, but I don't have access to the
source data to see what they might have missed.

BTW, according to
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/Research.html#anchor_72 a car's
construction uses over 1,000 gallons of oil, not gas.

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.


Similar ThreadsPosted
The *company* economics of a 401k match May 13, 2008, 5:15 am
Fidelity Versus Schwab? June 25, 2007, 5:08 am
Investing versus paying off Mortgage March 30, 2007, 3:02 pm
FROM THE MODERATORS: Fees versus commissions April 1, 2007, 10:07 am
Mortgage - fixed versus interest only April 10, 2007, 3:24 pm
Roth 401K versus variable annuity January 11, 2007, 9:24 am
OT Buying A Townhouse May 30, 2007, 4:59 am
renting vs. buying May 27, 2008, 6:54 pm
buying dollars July 4, 2008, 7:18 pm
chinese buying us equities May 14, 2007, 5:12 pm

other essential online resources:
United States Treasury
US Securities and Exchange Commission
New York Stock Exchange
Tokyo Stock Exchange
Accounting and Tax Software Forums

Contact Us | Privacy Policy   XML SitemapXML Sitemap